The graph shows us that in a normal instance, as height increases, shoe size does as well. The footprints at the scene were between 9.8 and 11.8 inches. On our graph we see that this means the criminal was around 66 inches tall. From this information we can infer that Rex Chapman is the criminal, because of his height of 5'8" which is very close to 66 inches. Also, the shoe size matches. In our graph, someone with a height of 68 inches had a shoe size of 11.5. Rex is also 68 inches tall, so it would make sense for his shoe size to be around 11.5, which fits within the range of the criminal's print.
The graph shows us that in a normal instance, as height increases, shoe size does as well. The footprints at the scene were between 9.8 and 11.8 inches. On our graph we see that this means the criminal was around 66 inches tall. From this information we can infer that Rex Chapman is the criminal, because of his height of 5'8" which is very close to 66 inches. Also, the shoe size matches. In our graph, someone with a height of 68 inches had a shoe size of 11.5. Rex is also 68 inches tall, so it would make sense for his shoe size to be around 11.5, which fits within the range of the criminal's print.